The Damage from Extreme Weather—and Challenges for Rebuilding

While Hurricane Harvey was certainly a historical event, each event exposes vulnerabilities resulting from how we’ve built in the past. Each event also yields lessons about how to make our cities resilient, and ultimately more competitive.

A day after Hurricane Harvey left Houston submerged in five feet (1.5 m) of water, the Washington Postpublished a piece examining the vulnerability of other low-lying cities—New Orleans, Tampa, New York, and Miami—to 100- and 500-year floods, which are events that have a one-in-100 chance or one-in-500 chance, respectively, of occurring in any given year in that location. Although the piece was specific to flood risk, the main takeaway—more people, more development, more vulnerability—is a certainty that could be applied to any city at risk for any natural disaster.

While Harvey was a historic storm, it was but one of several severe weather events affecting urban areas with increasing frequency around the world. (At the same time Houston was flooding, so was Mumbai. And, even as Houston begins its recovery, the powerful Hurricane Irma threatens the U.S. mainland and the Caribbean.) Although each event exposes vulnerabilities resulting from how we’ve built in the past, each event also yields lessons about how to build for the future, to make our cities more resilient and ultimately more competitive. These are lessons that, if learned, can help transform the long rebuilding process from one focused not just on building back, but also on moving forward:


  • There are no more “storms of the century.” Harvey produced unprecedented amounts of rainfall that would have inundated any city, no matter how well prepared. It was designated as a once-in-several-centuries event. But while chances of another storm on the scale of Harvey are remote, frequent crippling storms are not. What used to be considered a storm of the century can be expected to occur somewhere around the globe at least every few years—that is the reality of climate change.
  • Planning for resilience makes good business sense. Urban planning, design, and development must take into account that a severe weather event will occur sooner rather than later. However, resilience is not just about preparedness for major events. Resilient investments in infrastructure and resilient approaches to land use can 1) help cities protect residents more efficiently and cost effectively, and 2) foster business continuity and long-term investment and economic development opportunities. Planning for resilience makes investments in people, assets, and the value created in cities more secure.
  • The least vulnerable places should be positioned as the most attractive for development and investment. More and more cities are focusing on guiding investment and development to locations that are by nature and circumstance less vulnerable. They are accomplishing this with carrots such as supportive zoning policies or financial incentives, or through strategic deployment of city facilities. The point is to encourage a higher density of people, activities, and businesses in areas that have the infrastructure to thrive in changing conditions. ULI is helping move the needle in this regard: our resilience-focused Advisory Services work, including panels in Norfolk, Virginia; Lafayette, Louisiana; and Miami, aims to help cities identify and leverage their land use–related assets and move toward more resilient urban growth patterns over the long term.
  • Private sector input is vital as cities plan for resilience. To achieve on-the-ground results and a long-term transformation of the built environment, the private sector needs to be involved in land use decision-making to ensure that local policies are effective and benefit the entire community. Much of ULI’s work, particularly through our district council and national council networks, has sought to incorporate the private sector perspective in planning and building for resilience. And, through our new partnership with the Rockefeller Foundation’s 100 Resilient Cities program, more members will be assisting cities in becoming more resilient.

In September, attendees at ULI’s Housing Opportunity conference in New Orleans will be touring several mixed-income, mixed-use developments in Tremé, Gentilly, and mid-city neighborhoods that have been built in the post-Katrina years. What they will see are examples of building for resilience not just from an environmental standpoint, but in terms of improved livability, social equity, and economic vitality. Few could have envisioned these vibrant places in August 2005, when much of New Orleans looked like Houston in August 2017. Yet, they are built and they are thriving—places that demonstrate the value of reimagining and building for the future, rather than simply re-creating the past. This type of future-focused development is a trend that will make cities stronger and better able to withstand not just natural disasters, but other types of disruptors, too.

ULI has long promoted development practices that save energy, land, and other natural resources—practices that promote resilient communities. Our work in this area is supported by our Center for Sustainability and Economic Performance, with programs focused on improving building performance, energy conservation, urban resilience, and healthy communities. Each of these programs is helping ULI members lead the future of resilient development—and resilient development is the future of urban development. Cities as different from each other as Duluth, Minnesota, and Manila, Philippines, are moving ahead in this regard, as are the 40,000-plus ULI members who are leading by example with development that serves as a solution, rather than an obstacle, to improving urban resilience.

The reality of climate change and its impacts are forces that will—sooner rather than later—result in the institutionalization of resilience as a 21st-century development practice. This could be considered as the one silver lining to Harvey as well as future crises. We live in an urbanized world. Development is inevitable, but bad development is not. We are strengthening our communities through what we build, how we build, and where we build.

From 2009 to early 2018, Patrick L. Phillips served as the Global Chief Executive Officer of the Urban Land Institute (ULI). ULI, which currently has more than 200 employees and a budget of nearly $75 million, is headquartered in Washington, D.C., and has offices throughout the world. As Global CEO, Phillips worked with ULI’s member leaders to lead all aspects of ULI’s strategy, mission delivery, resource allocation, and fiscal performance. Phillips, a longtime member of ULI, has had a career in the economic analysis of real estate and land use that spans more than 30 years. Prior to taking the position as the top staff executive at ULI, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of ERA AECOM (formerly Economics Research Associates). In that role, he coordinated all aspects of ERA’s organization, strategy, business development, and service delivery. His own consulting practice focused specifically on the intersection of private investment and public policy. To further expand ERA’s reach and impact, Phillips guided the successful sale of the company in 2007 to AECOM, a globally renowned provider of professional technical and management support services to a broad range of industries, including land use, transportation, environmental and energy. His work at ERA AECOM focused on development strategy, development economics and feasibility analysis, and transaction-related services for real estate investors and developers, public agencies, financial institutions, universities, and non-profit organizations. This involved all major categories of urban land use, with an emphasis on the market, economic, and financial aspects of a new generation of downtown and suburban mixed-use projects. Under Phillip’s direction, ERA provided consulting services for such notable development projects as Mockingbird Station in Dallas, Atlantic Station in Atlanta, and the repositioning of Kansas City’s Country Club Plaza; as well as public planning projects for the Hudson Yards in New York City and Houston’s Buffalo Bayou. Phillips has often advised public agencies and non-profit organizations on issues related to public-private partnerships for economic development. He is a frequent speaker on urban development issues, and is the author or co-author of eight books and numerous articles. In 2005, Phillips led a nationally prominent economic development team as part of the ULI advisory services panel making recommendations on post-Katrina rebuilding efforts in New Orleans. Patrick teaches at Harvard’s Graduate School of Design Executive Education Program and at the Carey Business School of Johns Hopkins University. His academic training includes a graduate degree in public management and finance from Syracuse University’s Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs.
Related Content
Members Sign In
Don’t have an account yet? Sign up for a ULI guest account.
Members Sign In
Don’t have an account yet? Sign up for a ULI guest account.
Members Get More

With a ULI membership, you’ll stay informed on the most important topics shaping the world of real estate with unlimited access to the award-winning Urban Land magazine.

Learn more about the benefits of membership
Already have an account?