Sarah Jo Peterson

Members Sign In
Don’t have an account yet? Sign up for a ULI guest account.
Four developers share their experiences with the market for walkable and bicycle-friendly development.
With the major U.S. federal transportation law, 2012’s MAP-21 (Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century), expiring this October 1, activity is gearing up to decide what is next for the nation’s streets, highways, and transit systems. The biggest headache will be funding. Federal taxes on motor fuels are failing to generate enough revenue to maintain even current spending levels.
No one wants an unsafe, uninviting street. So why has this been so difficult to change? And in places where people have successfully initiated change, what are they doing differently?
Private companies are going the last mile to ensure that their facilities are well served by transit. And they see it as a way to maintain their competitive edge.
Despite setbacks, leaders in the Tampa Bay area continue to push for regional transit in the name of economic competitiveness.
At the Urban Land Institute’s 2011 Fall Meeting and Urban Land Expo in Los Angeles last month, one panel offered up the collective wisdom of those who have a long history of making transit-oriented development happen. Read more to learn what one participant had to say about the newest iteration of TOD—3.0—which combines transit-rich locations, real estate development, and livability.
Four out of five public transit agencies in the United States will be forced to either raise fares or cut service this coming year, says the American Public Transportation Association. Read more to learn what a coalition of business, environmental, and transit advocates did to win over Republicans in the county council and save the transit system in King County, Washington, from drastic cuts.
Earlier this month, Republicans on the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee put forth a six-year, $230 billion proposal that cuts existing federal spending levels by roughly one-third. But last week, a bipartisan group of Senators responded to the House proposal claiming the solution is a shorter bill—only two years—that maintains existing spending levels at $109 billion.
In Northwest Indiana, restructuring has shrunk industry’s environmental footprint. In the 1980s, area leaders began to recognize the valuable asset in their midst—Lake Michigan and its shoreline. Read how five diverse cities spread across two counties are acting as one to recapture and preserve the lakeshore for open public use while capitalizing on its potential for economic development.
Leaders who worked on three transformative urban projects showed why the projects had distinguished themselves as ULI award winners at the “Game Changers” session at ULI’s 2010 Fall Meeting. Urban Redevelopment Authority of Singapore introduced The Southern Ridges; Downtown Fort Worth, Texas and its Sundance Square; and, Columbia Heights, a historic neighborhood in northwest Washington, D.C., and its commercial center are three case studies that offer what the public sector can do, even in the current economic climate.
ULI Chicago’s Infrastructure Committee began looking for ways to improve infrastructure decision-making in 2008. The 48-member committee started with two premises: that the region should invest in infrastructure, not spend on it, and that implementation offered fresh opportunities for private sector involvement. Read about the process the committee has come up with that identifies infrastructure “game changers.”
Because bus rapid transit (BRT) seems to play out differently in every community, different types of bus infrastructure and service may all be called BRT. Both the public and private sectors need to share the specifics of what is being planned and developed. Only then will it be clear whether there are opportunities to turn your community’s BRT into bus rapid transit-oriented development (BRTOD).
Urban Land Contributors