Sarah Jo Peterson

Industry leaders with experience in North America, Europe, and Asia share the latest on building energy efficiency.
Despite his significant expertise with public/private partnerships (P3s) in the United States, Jay Hailey, an attorney at DLA Piper, found something new to share with attendees at the 2014 ULI Spring Meeting in Vancouver, British Columbia: the Canadian P3 model.
Four developers share their experiences with the market for walkable and bicycle-friendly development.
With the major U.S. federal transportation law, 2012’s MAP-21 (Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century), expiring this October 1, activity is gearing up to decide what is next for the nation’s streets, highways, and transit systems. The biggest headache will be funding. Federal taxes on motor fuels are failing to generate enough revenue to maintain even current spending levels.
No one wants an unsafe, uninviting street. So why has this been so difficult to change? And in places where people have successfully initiated change, what are they doing differently?
Private companies are going the last mile to ensure that their facilities are well served by transit. And they see it as a way to maintain their competitive edge.
Despite setbacks, leaders in the Tampa Bay area continue to push for regional transit in the name of economic competitiveness.
At the Urban Land Institute’s 2011 Fall Meeting and Urban Land Expo in Los Angeles last month, one panel offered up the collective wisdom of those who have a long history of making transit-oriented development happen. Read more to learn what one participant had to say about the newest iteration of TOD—3.0—which combines transit-rich locations, real estate development, and livability.
Four out of five public transit agencies in the United States will be forced to either raise fares or cut service this coming year, says the American Public Transportation Association. Read more to learn what a coalition of business, environmental, and transit advocates did to win over Republicans in the county council and save the transit system in King County, Washington, from drastic cuts.
Earlier this month, Republicans on the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee put forth a six-year, $230 billion proposal that cuts existing federal spending levels by roughly one-third. But last week, a bipartisan group of Senators responded to the House proposal claiming the solution is a shorter bill—only two years—that maintains existing spending levels at $109 billion.
Members Sign In
Don’t have an account yet? Sign up for a ULI guest account.