The Future of the Strip?

by Edward T. McMahon

Text Size: A | A | A

March 2, 2011

 McMahonStrip_5_300
A typical commercial strip.
For more than 50 years, retailers have favored the commercial strip: a linear pattern of retail businesses strung along major roadways characterized by massive parking lots, big signs, boxlike buildings, and a total dependence on automobiles for access and circulation.

For years, planners have tried to contain and improve the strip. Now they are getting help from consumers and the marketplace. The era of strip development is slowly coming to an end. Evolving consumer behavior, changing demographics, high-priced gasoline, internet shopping, and the urbanization of the suburbs are all pointing to a new paradigm for commercial development.

Commercial strips are not going to disappear overnight, but it is becoming increasingly clear that strip retail is retail for the last century. The future belongs to town centers, main streets, and mixed-use development. Here is why:

We’re overbuilt on the strip

From 1960 to 2000 there was an almost tenfold increase in U.S. retail space, from four to 38 square feet per person. For many years, retail space was growing five to six times faster than retail sales. Most of this space came in the form of discount superstores on the suburban strip.

The recession proved that we have too much retail. Strip centers are now littered with vacant stores. By some estimates, there is currently more than 1 billion square feet of vacant retail space, much of which has to be repurposed or demolished. One retail analyst estimates that we need to demolish 300 million square feet of retail space.

McMahonStrip_4_250
Urban Wal-Mart proposed for
Washington, D.C.
Retail is rediscovering the city

In 2010, Target announced plans to remodel the century-old Carson Pirie Scott department store in Chicago. This landmark building, designed by architect Louis Sullivan, will be just one of many new, so-called big-box retailers planned for urban neighborhoods.

Similarly, in late 2010 Wal-Mart announced plans for its first-ever stores in Washington, D.C. To make the four new stores fit into an urban environment, the company has agreed to consider an array of new layouts, designs, and parking arrangements.

The store planned for New Jersey Avenue illustrates Wal-Mart’s new approach. The company plans a store of 75,000 to 80,000 square feet (much smaller than usual) on the ground floor of a five-story mixed-use building featuring 315 apartments, underground parking, and space for small retail stores. Home Depot already has a new urban store in Toronto with housing on top.

At the same time that Wal-Mart, Target, Home Depot, and others are planning new urban stores all over America, as many as 400 former big-box stores sit vacant on commercial strips. Most analysts agree that urban neighborhoods are the new frontier for retail—the one place left with more spending power than stores to spend it in.

The suburbs are being urbanized

At the same time that retail is rediscovering the city, the suburbs are being redesigned. Chris Leinberger recently declared that “the largest redevelopment trend of the next generation will be the conversion of dead or dying strip commercial centers in the suburbs into walkable urban places.” (“Walkable Urbanism,” Urban Land, September 1, 2010). The conversion of car-dependent suburban development is already underway in many metropolitan areas like Washington and Los Angeles, and can be expected to increase in the years to come. Perhaps the nation’s most dramatic transformation has already occurred in Arlington County, Virginia, where Wilson Boulevard, once a miles-long, low-density strip lined with used-car lots and fast-food joints, has been transformed into a walkable urban place. According to Leinberger, “Arlington County now gets 60 percent of its tax revenue from 10 percent of its land mass.”

Traffic congestion, fuel prices, and auto-oriented design are problems for the strip

Americans value convenience, but the perceived convenience of the strip has been reduced as traffic congestion has worsened in recent years. Add to this rising fuel prices and an overall physical environment designed for cars, instead of people, and it’s understandable why fewer people want to shop the strip and almost no one wants to linger.

Suburban town centers and main streets provide a “place-making dividend” that the homogeneous blur of the strip can’t match. They also provide a “park once” environment that will grow in importance if fuel prices rise. Just imagine what will happen to strip development if gas prices hit $5 a gallon or more, as some analysts predict.

McMahonStrip_3_250
The old paradigm: single use,
auto-oriented.
Young consumers favor walkability and places with character

Walking for pleasure is, by far, America’s number-one form of outdoor recreation. If you combine walking with shopping—another one of America’s favorite pastimes—you have a winning combination. Time-constrained lifestyles and boredom with the dull sameness of most strip centers have meant a slow but steady decline in the number and length of stays at strip malls. People go to get what they want and they leave. A pleasant (i.e., “cool”) atmosphere is particularly important to the GenY generation. A mixed-use town center with street life, outdoor dining, and places to hang out, walk, and window-shop are much more likely to get the affection and the dollars of young shoppers than an auto-dependent strip.

The economy is restructuring the retail landscape

The recession saw the collapse of numerous big-box chains, like Circuit City and Linens ’n Things. This helped send vacancy rates soaring. After three years on the brink, consumer confidence has improved, but many analysts say we can expect a new “normal” when it comes to retail spending. Why? Because unemployment remains high, the days of unlimited credit are over, and retail analysts predict that a “new consumer frugality” will be the norm for years to come. What’s more, strip centers without anchors (like grocery stores) and Class B malls are virtually unfinanceable, according to many experts.

We’re also moving into an era of hybrid shopping centers. We used to have three standardized formats: the strip, the enclosed mall, and the power center. Now, all of these things are coming together in one place, in a hybrid format. According to commercial analysts, this means we are going to see a far greater mix of tenants than in the past. No longer will there be a Wal-Mart on one side of the street and a mall on the other. In the future, the Wal-Mart and the Costco will be in the same mall as Nordstrom and Macy’s. Also, many malls will more closely resemble old-fashioned main streets. Already, seven of the 13 regional malls in the Denver metropolitan area—like Belmar in Lakewood, Colorado—have been turned into mixed-use town centers.

 McMahonStrip_2_250
The new paradigm: mixed use, accessible
by both cars and pedestrians.
E-Commerce means fewer and smaller stores

Today, the nation’s “healthiest” retailer is not Wal-Mart or Costco. It is Amazon. Amazon has exploited the increasing availability of broadband internet and mobile technology to build a retail superpower. One of the biggest reasons why the strip is coming to an end is because bricks-and-mortar stores are becoming a smaller part of the retail landscape.

First, it was catalog shopping; now it is e-commerce, social media, and mobile phones. This means that retailers will seek smaller footprints as merchandise categories move to online channels. For example, the rise of Netflix and streaming video means the end of bricks-and motor video stores. E-readers portend the end or at least the downsizing of bookstores; ditto for music stores, greeting card stores, and other merchandise categories.

None of this is meant to suggest that we won’t still have neighborhood centers with grocery stores, drugstores, and coffee shops, among other things. We will. But the endless expansion of the commercial strip—that homogeneous cluster of, sign clutter and asphalt that leads out from every town—is reaching the end of its useful life. A new paradigm is being shaped—not just by regulation, but also by consumers and the marketplace. Commercial strips (i.e., “road towns”) with no beginning and no end, with no center and no way to get around except by car, are becoming obsolete in an era of shrinking stores, rising gas prices, discerning consumers, walkable suburbs, and online shopping.

To read a related article, see Repositioning Urban Corridors by Karen Gulley.

Want to join the conversation?


Log in or join ULI now.

Comments (4)

Mr. Jeffrey K. Ericson - Phoenix, AZ wrote - on March 10, 2011 at 5:59 PM

Good Article - I'd like to add one more variable - cost of land. Cheap land invites cheap buildings and lots of parking. This is the formula that drives the suburbs and rural development even today. Higher cost land and higher barriers to entry justify more investment in design and execution. I believe that the current iteration of 'lifestyle' centers is just a blip on the radar as retailers grapple with new realities and try to 'monetize' the quality of our diminishing free time. Amazon does this well by handling all of the logistics, including delivery to your house. Costco does this by the suggestion that you can consolidate the burden of shopping into one ugly weekly or monthly trip. Starbucks patrons 'reward' themselves with an overpriced coffee or latte. Driving is no longer fun, and no longer equates to freedom. We can't talk on our cell phones, we can't have a beer, we're stuck in traffic. The appeal of walkable areas is undeniable, but our lifestyles are still tethered to the car, which means multi-level parking structures attached to the lifestyle center, and the always ugly experience of navigating that.

Kate Milgrim - Philadelphia, PA wrote - on March 10, 2011 at 4:26 PM

Density and good design are twin elements of the urban retail described here, and I agree that shopping in an urban environment and even some 'lifestyle centers' is preferable to big box alternatives. However, I see two major hurdles that need to be addressed before we start seeing significant numbers of big box retailers move into the city and go vertical. First, from a shopper's perspective, how do I get my purchases home or to my car? 70 years ago, people made daily trips to the store for consumables and needed to carry only a bag or two home. Second, finding buildings or infill sites (and their adjacent streets) that would accommodate tractor-trailers and loading docks is a significant challenge. I believe that two paradigms must change before we start seeing a real shift away from strip and power centers. Shoppers will need to change the way they shop, and real estate professionals (investors and developers) will need to be convinced that retail in urban or mixed-use centers is more profitable than big boxes. This is a chicken and an egg situation. Hopefully, as people continue to move into cities they will support their neighborhood stores to keep demand localized.

Mr. John W. Shardlow FAICP - Saint Paul, MN wrote - on March 10, 2011 at 11:56 AM

This is a timely article on a very important topic and a set of land use issues that we are trying to deal with for many public and private sector clients. The new examples that are cited are very helpful, but they show what can be done to redevelop strips in areas with high population density and excellent transit service, in walkable neighborhoods. In contrast, one of my suburban city clients has over 30 aging strip centers that were all built in the 1980s and many of them are on smaller sites, sandwiched between very busy roadways and fully developed, low to medium density residential neighborhoods. The adjacent residential areas are automobile oriented, suburban styled subdivisions, which for the most part are not yet ready to be redeveloped. This suburban strip center reuse dilemma is a much tougher nut to crack. Some can be repositioned with a face lift and new tenants. Some are not so dominated by highway noise and related impact and they can be converted to mixed use, or even straight residential in a different pattern. Unfortunately, the majority of the sites are small with shape and access constraints and are overwhelmed by highway noise. These are much harder to figure out.

Mr. Trent A. Noll - Santa Ana, CA wrote - on March 7, 2011 at 6:01 PM

Modern Place making has evolved full circle pointing us back to what worked in the past and blending it with its context in today's retail development landscape. Despite the financial pressures and perils of modern place making, domestically and globally we see cities and developers turning to architects, landscape architects, and urban planners to craft places that attract tenants and customers from early morn through late evening extending the urban life cycle of a place. In many ways, the art of making a place where people want to gather and live today involves a restoration of nostalgic sensibilities that some Americans have lost, still holding strong in small-town America—a central Main Street or square, fronted by town walks, civic buildings , specialty retailers, family eateries with down town live work housing, neighborhood theater, central park with town square, and massive street trees. In brief, the historic norm evolved functionally with gathering places to shop, mingle, live, work, eat, and rest in the park, stroll, and take in a movie, people-watch, meet friends. Even before the emergence of “mixed-use” as a popular urban planning buzzword, Americans were naturally enjoying the benefits. Domestic population growth, suburbanization, and the ubiquitous automobile in the Post-War era in many cities changed the traditional Main Street ideal. And for several decades, what replaced Main Street was not focused on a quality of experience but a drive toward the fastest most convenient, best value for the consumer. There is no gainsaying the convenience of the automobile, but car-friendly and people-friendly districts became inundated in many Post-War business districts or shopping-centers. Too often what emerged in suburban America were strip- and big-box malls that were accessed by primarily by cars conveniently parked in front of oversized buildings on large, treeless asphalt parking lots. In some cases, new urban America gave way to single-use office campuses; the kind that emptied after the work was done. Office plazas often became barren without healthy street-life, and often safety forbidding to pedestrians. Most people arrived by car and punched out the same way. Now day’s developers and city planners ultimately realized that inhospitality proved to be a bad business model. Public and private planners and developers are moving to partner together and refit failed projects of the past bringing new life to broken properties From misguided beginnings in the 1950s and 1960s, designers began to resurrect elements that had proved so successful in traditional placemaking—the importance of landscape amenities in the resurrected town square, the street promenade, and the central park gardens can change a place from vacant to inviting. In recent developments the regional destination projects including Casinos and major-league athletic stadiums have now evolved into mixed-used Mecca’s with resplendent landscapes, along with multiple dining and retail opportunities. And, of course, modern shopping developments are often full-fledged recreations of friendly, mixed-use urban zones. It was not only nostalgia or “modern urbanism” that led to the placemaking renaissance, but a need to salvage revenues from failed commercial development models. If A casino, mixed-use office park, shopping mall downtown district, or resort that isn’t thriving 18 hours a day its bad planning, and poor use of the developer’s dollar and a city’s taxable assets. It may be expensive to provide landscape amenities; but for cities and developers it has become more expensive not to. Design-Build Place making Plainly, the modern art of successful mixed-use placemaking—on time and on budget—is much more design-intense than the process of single-use office districts or tract housing developments. For city planners and developers is the challenge to create urban places with, memorable characteristics that will entice retailers to invest in them. Too much uniformity in the fashion mix, little diversity in food and beverage choices, or not enough landscape amenities such as common area resting areas and interesting interactive landscape elements can spell defeat. For private developers the goal is both to make a long lasting place that is flexible enough to grow and change over time while making money doing it. For city planners and private developers, a worthy option is to turn to a design-build team from the start. Design-build helps control costs in such immensely detailed undertakings, in part because constructability is vetted from the get-go, and the relationships between designers, contractors, through the design and construction processes are integral and unified. In either public- or private-sector placemaking, landscape has become expected to reach success, due to the enduring human yearning and love for nature, and the developer’s need to create projects that attract customers and tenants through the entire extended business clock. In the design-build process, prime landscape opportunities are brought to the fore early on, before schedule constraints dictate either additional expenses or hard choices that could undercut the aesthetics and sense of place. Without expertly designed and built hardscapes and landscapes, the winning sense of place becomes almost unachievable. Most important, a unified design-build team can help ensure that overall project aesthetics and costs are consistent from the big idea to the smallest design detail where individual cost is married to project success. The end result is a richer physical environ, and better return for all involved. Trent Noll, ASLA, is senior principal and director of design for ValleyCrest Design Group, a global collective of award-winning landscape architects and designers specializing in world-class, sustainable, and forward-thinking landscape design. The company is lauded for its integrated design-build approach, completing projects from offices in Los Angeles and Orange County, Calif.; Orlando, Denver and Shanghai, China.

Specify objectionable content

Thank you for your comment.
NewGround_300

Advertisement